1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Progress, down 22 kgs vs. Mike Matthews

SHOWDOWN

Progress, down 22 kgs
By Anonymous, ID: ab735y14
Picture 1
Age:20
Height:186 cm  ·  6'1"
Weight:75 kg  ·  165 lbs
Body Fat %:13.5%
BMI:21.7
Muscle Index:4.5
Sexy Index:6.8
Body Type:
Tall
Fit
Mango
VS.
Mike Matthews
By Adregia, ID: mm6e8n3x
Picture 1
Age:33
Height:188 cm  ·  6'2"
Weight:83 kg  ·  183 lbs
Body Fat %:14.4%
BMI:23.5
Muscle Index:5.2
Sexy Index:7
Body Type:
Tall
Fit
Viking
↓↓  Scroll Down for Comparison Shots  ↓↓
Full Body Scale
Full Size Comparison Click for other views
Centered on Torso
Torso Comparison Click for other views
With Transparency
Torso Comparison Torso Comparison Use slider on the right
↓↓   Stats Breakdown   ↓↓
Progress, down 22 kgs Picture 1
Mike Matthews Picture 1
Height
186 cm
6'1"
2 cm
1 inches
shorter
188 cm
6'2"
2 cm
1 inches
taller
Weight
75 kg
165 lbs
8 kg
18 lbs
lighter
83 kg
183 lbs
8 kg
18 lbs
heavier
Body Fat %
13.5%
Fit
6.3%  lower
14.4%
Fit
6.7%  higher
Muscle Index
4.5
13.5%  less swole
5.2
Swole-ish
15.6%  swoler
Sexy Index
6.8
5.6%   less sexy
7
Sexy
5.9% sexier
BMI
21.7
Average
7.7%  lower
23.5
Average
8.3%  higher
Daily Calorie Needs  (?)
2378 kcal
High
7.9%  lower
2582 kcal
High
8.6%  higher
Shoulders-to-Waist Width Ratio
1.48
Average
11.4%  lower
1.67
Very High
12.8%  higher
FFMI (?)
18.8
Average
6.5%  lower
20.1
Average
6.9%  higher
Lean Mass
64.9 kg
143 lbs
6.1 kg
13 lbs
lighter
71 kg
157 lbs
6.1 kg
13 lbs
heavier
Shoulders Span
49.9 cm
20 inches
14.8%  lower
58.6 cm
23 inches
17.4%  higher
Waist Span
33.7 cm
13 inches
4%  lower
35.1 cm
14 inches
4.2%  higher
Fat Mass
10.1 kg
22 lbs
1.9 kg
4 lbs
lighter
12 kg
26 lbs
1.9 kg
4 lbs
heavier
Age
20
13y younger
33
13y older

User comments